Tract Runsheet
Real estate professionals running title on a surface parcel. Oil & gas professionals running title on a mineral tract. Both use the same County.Land service, deep landman title work on a single tract, with every relevant document from every source.
Two audiences, one service
You're closing on a tract and need a deeper title look than your title company's commitment provides. Or you're a commercial broker doing due diligence on a property with a complicated chain. Or you've got a contract that depends on a specific reservation, easement, or boundary call.
We run the full chain on the tract: every recorded instrument, every encumbrance, every cross-reference. You get a workbook and a written summary you can put in front of your buyer, your lender, or your attorney.
You're a landman, a fund partner, or an operator who needs title run on a specific mineral tract, not a whole county. You need the runsheet, the chain, the abstractor's notes, the cross-references to releases and ratifications, and the lease/HBP picture.
We run the full O&G title work-up on the tract: all instruments, mineral severance trace, current ownership with interest fractions, well/permit data joined, skip-traced owners.
What you get
A Tract Runsheet workbook is a scaled-down version of the County Foundation, same craft, narrower scope.
| Tab | What's in it |
|---|---|
| Subject Tract | Parcel ID, legal description, acreage, current owner of record, CAD valuation |
| Runsheet | Every recorded instrument touching the tract, chronological, normalized, with Abstractor's Notes on every row |
| Title Chain | Full chain of title from the root forward, every grantor → grantee, every interest passed, every pivot annotated |
| Cross-References | Releases, ratifications, corrections, partitions, easements that touch the tract |
| Encumbrances | Liens, mortgages, easements, ROW agreements, restrictive covenants, current and historical |
| Mineral Status (O&G work-ups) | Severance trace, current mineral ownership, lease status, HBP inference, well/permit data joined |
| Owner Detail | Skip-traced contact info for current owners (O&G) or last-known owners on broken chains (RE) |
| Document Library | Every source PDF hyperlinked from every referencing row |
| Abstractor's Summary | Plain-English written summary from a senior Texas landman, what's clean, what's flagged, what's recommended |
The deep difference
A title insurance commitment is a legal opinion structured to support an insurance policy. It's narrow on purpose, the underwriter cares about the policy's exposure, not your operational questions.
Landman title work is different. We aren't optimizing a policy; we're answering the questions you actually have:
When buyers use Tract Runsheet
You're buying a tract and your title company's commitment doesn't answer the questions your investment committee is asking.
The tract has unclear mineral status. The title commitment excludes minerals; you need to know what you're actually buying.
A boundary dispute, an easement question, or a chain-of-title challenge. You need a written abstract from a senior landman.
The tract has a broken chain, a probate that wasn't closed properly, or unvested heirs. We trace it and recommend curative action.
You're targeting a single tract for leasing and need the full ownership + HBP picture before sending offer letters.
You know there's a problem in the chain and need it identified, documented, and a curative path recommended.
Tract Runsheet vs County Foundation
| Tract Runsheet | County Foundation | |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | One tract (or a handful) | The whole county |
| Buyer | Closing a deal, doing diligence, solving a problem | Entering a basin, planning a campaign, building a position |
| Typical use case | Per-transaction | Strategic / portfolio |
| Turnaround | 2–5 business days | ~5 weeks |
| Output | Workbook + written abstractor's summary | nine-sheet linked workbook + Atlas + Methodology |
| Title insurance | No, research and abstract only | No, research and abstract only |